This is from the always worth reading Kaye Lee at The Australian Independent Media – I hope she will forgive me for reblogging without her express permission (and I note that several Pubkateers have commented already).

(Image Credit: Daily Fumes)
An excerpt from They Thought They Were Free – The Germans, 1933-45 by Milton Mayer:
What no one seemed to notice was the ever widening gap, after 1933, between the government and the people. Just think how very wide this gap was to begin with, here in Germany. And it became always wider. You know, it doesn’t make people close to their government to be told that this is a people’s government, a true democracy, or to be enrolled in civilian defense, or even to vote. All this has little, really nothing, to do with knowing one is governing.
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would otherwise have worried about it.
This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of government growing remoter and remoter.
The dictatorship, and the whole process of its coming into being, was above all diverting. It provided an excuse not to think for people who did not want to think anyway. I do not speak of your ‘little men,’ your baker and so on; I speak of my colleagues and myself, learned men, mind you. Most of us did not want to think about fundamental things and never had. There was no need to. Nazism gave us some dreadful, fundamental things to think about—we were decent people—and kept us so busy with continuous changes and ‘crises’ and so fascinated, yes, fascinated, by the machinations of the ‘national enemies,’ without and within, that we had no time to think about these dreadful things that were growing, little by little, all around us. Unconsciously, I suppose, we were grateful. Who wants to think?
To live in this process is absolutely not to be able to notice it—please try to believe me—unless one has a much greater degree of political awareness, acuity, than most of us had ever had occasion to develop. Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, ‘regretted,’ that, unless one were detached from the whole process from the beginning, unless one understood what the whole thing was in principle, what all these ‘little measures’ that no ‘patriotic German’ could resent must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing. One day it is over his head.
How is this to be avoided, among ordinary men, even highly educated ordinary men? Frankly, I do not know. I do not see, even now. Many, many times since it all happened I have pondered that pair of great maxims, Principiis obsta and Finem respice—‘Resist the beginnings’ and ‘Consider the end.’ But one must foresee the end in order to resist, or even see, the beginnings. One must foresee the end clearly and certainly and how is this to be done, by ordinary men or even by extraordinary men? Things might have. And everyone counts on that might.
Your ‘little men,’ your Nazi friends, were not against National Socialism in principle. Men like me, who were, are the greater offenders, not because we knew better (that would be too much to say) but because we sensed better. Pastor Niemöller spoke for the thousands and thousands of men like me when he spoke (too modestly of himself) and said that, when the Nazis attacked the Communists, he was a little uneasy, but, after all, he was not a Communist, and so he did nothing; and then they attacked the Socialists, and he was a little uneasier, but, still, he was not a Socialist, and he did nothing; and then the schools, the press, the Jews, and so on, and he was always uneasier, but still he did nothing. And then they attacked the Church, and he was a Churchman, and he did something—but then it was too late.
You see, one doesn’t see exactly where or how to move. Believe me, this is true. Each act, each occasion, is worse than the last, but only a little worse. You wait for the next and the next. You wait for one great shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join with you in resisting somehow. You don’t want to act, or even talk, alone; you don’t want to ‘go out of your way to make trouble.’ Why not?—Well, you are not in the habit of doing it. And it is not just fear, fear of standing alone, that restrains you; it is also genuine uncertainty.
Uncertainty is a very important factor, and, instead of decreasing as time goes on, it grows. Outside, in the streets, in the general community, ‘everyone’ is happy. One hears no protest, and certainly sees none. You know, in France or Italy there would be slogans against the government painted on walls and fences; in Germany, outside the great cities, perhaps, there is not even this. In the university community, in your own community, you speak privately to your colleagues, some of whom certainly feel as you do; but what do they say? They say, ‘It’s not so bad’ or ‘You’re seeing things’ or ‘You’re an alarmist.’
And you are an alarmist. You are saying that this must lead to this, and you can’t prove it. These are the beginnings, yes; but how do you know for sure when you don’t know the end, and how do you know, or even surmise, the end? On the one hand, your enemies, the law, the regime, the Party, intimidate you. On the other, your colleagues pooh-pooh you as pessimistic or even neurotic. You are left with your close friends, who are, naturally, people who have always thought as you have.
Now, in small gatherings of your oldest friends, you feel that you are talking to yourselves, that you are isolated from the reality of things. This weakens your confidence still further and serves as a further deterrent to—to what? It is clearer all the time that, if you are going to do anything, you must make an occasion to do it, and then you are obviously a troublemaker. So you wait, and you wait.
But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That’s the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked—if, let us say, the gassing of the Jews in ’43 had come immediately after the ‘German Firm’ stickers on the windows of non-Jewish shops in ’33. But of course this isn’t the way it happens. In between come all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next. Step C is not so much worse than Step B, and, if you did not make a stand at Step B, why should you at Step C? And so on to Step D.
And one day, too late, your principles, if you were ever sensible of them, all rush in upon you. The burden of self-deception has grown too heavy, and some minor incident, in my case my little boy, hardly more than a baby, saying ‘Jewish swine,’ collapses it all at once, and you see that everything, everything, has changed and changed completely under your nose. The world you live in—your nation, your people—is not the world you were born in at all. The forms are all there, all untouched, all reassuring, the houses, the shops, the jobs, the mealtimes, the visits, the concerts, the cinema, the holidays. But the spirit, which you never noticed because you made the lifelong mistake of identifying it with the forms, is changed. Now you live in a world of hate and fear, and the people who hate and fear do not even know it themselves; when everyone is transformed, no one is transformed. Now you live in a system which rules without responsibility even to God. The system itself could not have intended this in the beginning, but in order to sustain itself it was compelled to go all the way.
You have gone almost all the way yourself. Life is a continuing process, a flow, not a succession of acts and events at all. It has flowed to a new level, carrying you with it, without any effort on your part. On this new level you live, you have been living more comfortably every day, with new morals, new principles. You have accepted things you would not have accepted five years ago, a year ago, things that your father, even in Germany, could not have imagined.
Suddenly it all comes down, all at once. You see what you are, what you have done, or, more accurately, what you haven’t done (for that was all that was required of most of us: that we do nothing). You remember those early meetings of your department in the university when, if one had stood, others would have stood, perhaps, but no one stood. A small matter, a matter of hiring this man or that, and you hired this one rather than that. You remember everything now, and your heart breaks. Too late. You are compromised beyond repair.
Note: Thanks to mars08 for this chilling reminder
TLBD
😆 I’d love to hear his commentary of cat curling.
Assistant Health Minister Fiona Nash’s failure to meet with public health bodies labelled ‘strange’
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/assistant-health-minister-fiona-nashs-failure-to-meet-with-public-health-bodies-labelled-strange-20140227-33m12.html
Is it possible that Abbott’s little buddy Furnival was intended to be the de-facto minister, making all the decisions, giving all the orders and taking all the meetings, with Ms Nash just a Coalition Barbie blonde figurehead?
Leonetwo,
When I read that article, I thought the exact same thing. We all know what Abbott thinks of women, I would not put it past him to use her as a figurehead minister so he can have an un-elected mate from Big Food in goverment to do the dirty work he’s promised.
Cadbury et al > Furnival > Gnash > Abbott >Credlin.
Leone
It would fit in with the Liebrals agenda.
No act is too tawdry or low for the Abbott government.
The origins of cat curling
The Checkout on the ABC is an excellent program. They just show you the shonks without commentary, because they speak for themselves. Adult TV.
You get more information in 30 minutes than 7.5 gives you in a month.
http://www.abc.net.au/tv/thecheckout/episodes/s02ep02.htm
There’s something weird about the whole Cadbury/Furniva/Nash thing. The government looked very uncomfortable in QT today during the questions about it, even the females in the noddy seats were lemon-lipped. Abbott clearly didn’t have any answers so he kept saying the same lines over and over ‘I’m surprised the opposition wants to talk about this on a day when Qantas workers are told they willl lose their jobs’, ‘Flogging this dead horse’, ‘Money for more jobs’, ‘The people voted for it’. There was constant government interference, Pyne with an interruption, or Broomhilda fending off Labor points of order, both protecting Abbott by trying to prevent the questions being answered.
duckie
I like that show!
Leone,
Labor has twigged and is going for it. Catherine King is the front-line.
Her refusal to withdraw today is a good indication.
Good stuff.
Maybe she should wear a cyclist top with Cadbury endorsement next QT. I’d like to see that!
Noddy and Shaky weren’t up to it today?
Leroy,
The good ol’ Hun doesn’t neglect sex and drugs on its front page.
“Pyne with an interruption, or Broomhilda fending off Labor points of order, both protecting Abbott by trying to prevent the questions being answered.”
SNAFU.
Catherine King was a star today. Bruce Scott just didn’t know what to do when she refused to withdraw her remark. Funny, isn’t it. A Labor MP gets thrown out for telling the truth while government MPs, the PM especially, lie in parliament every day and no-one does a thing.
Leone,
The Speaker cannot do “please” rather than demand and chuck the member who refuses to please.
I think Scott is a decent pollie. He was out of his depth and was “prevailed upon”.
Thank you to all the brave Pubsters who watched/listened to QT today and reported on the shenanigans. Apart from the fact that I had other things to do (no, not sorting out my navel fluff collection this time) I no longer have the stomach for the travesty of parliamentary democracy which we now endure.
A friend whom I once thought politically astute attempted to reassure me before the election with wtte “Abbott will NEVER be allowed to do all those [bad] things” moi had been suggesting.
I haven’t asked him yet what he thinks of the current state of play.
Anyway, moi needs a change: mum and I are off tomorrow to drive the Great Alpine Road and to explore East and South Gippsland (carefully avoiding Morwell). Of course we will drop in on Gravel and Razz – I just hope they realise what they are letting themselves in for …
So, as I probably won’t be around for tomorrow evening’s raffle, my apologies.
One of the trustier laptops will accompany us, and we will have wifi, so I’ll catch up at some point – probably when mum is asleep.
G’night, everyone.
Brandis is getting a hard time on Trade Agreements. Senate Hearings
Scott has been the Deputy Speaker since 2007, as far as I recall.
He didn’t have to cope with any aggro from Rudd – Gillard – Rudd. He is now facing an opposition that does more than three-word slogans.
Thanks, Fed up,
Now watching.
Fiona
You and your Mum have a good trip.
The DH does not do bonhomie very well.
No match for Our Penny.
Penny reminds me of Mrs Fawlty.
The DH and the public servants are Basil and Orally men.
The departmental lady is waaay out of her depth.
This is all very dry stuff but hugely important to Australia. Won’t make the front pages.
She volunteers too much information. Just answer the questions, lady!
The Fibbers on the Committee are no better.
Penny must be bored out of her mind.
She is now “putting a proposition to you”. Dear, oh dear!
Penny now goes the negotiations with China.
Careful, lady, you might be about to compromise your government!
Lib chairthing tries to protect her.
DFAT lady’s body language is very defensive.
Sit up straight and don’t fidget!
This is primary school stuff.
Refuse to answer “What is the government proposing”.
Penny has them rattled.
Nervous all around.
Fibber gives a dixer to DH Brandis.
Not a Fibber? A Green?
Penny shows Brandis up
No one can say this has been a good week for the government.
Definitely not a Fibber.
My apologies.
Fed up,
Penny is nailing DFAT. DFAT is refusing to discuss Abbott’s policy.
I wonder why!
Penny knows way more about what Australia’s commitments are than the DFAT lady. The DH goes protect.
What does Tourism Australia have to contribute?
Cameron is giving them just a hard a time on the other channel. The bravo they were showing early in the week seems to have disappeared.
They are going late.
Exeunt omnes (?) from the committee except for the chairthing.
PS is now criticizing the previous government. Defending Abetz.
Fed up,
On what topic?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/27/schapelle-corby-show-will-go-ahead-on-sunday-but-interview-is-still-off-limits
Does anyone care? Does anyone think what Mercedes Fist-Full-Of-Dollars thinks?
Which committee?
Never mind, I found it.