“Just the facts, ma’am”: What a citizen should expect from the media

Guest Author Uncategorized

Today’s Guest Author is Catalyst, with an eloquent plea to the media and our legislators. Thank you, Catalyst.

The earnest request for ‘Just the facts, ma’am,’ came from Dragnet’s lieutenant Joe Friday. An old time TV series with clear back and white values. Joe Friday’s remark encapsulates what I want from the media in their role of reporting news stories. The facts, clearly stated without distortion or interpretation.

Opinion pieces that are labelled as such are another matter. For some time now in my opinion, our ‘fourth estate’ has been failing us, the public, in factual reporting

The fourth estate, which is how journalists are described, has a unique function in our western democracies. They are supposed to represent us, the people. Their task is to stand for the interests of the people in scrutinizing the events of the day, fairly and without favour, especially the actions of the government and opposition. I’ve italicised where I believe our media fails us, most especially when it comes to subjecting the opposition to scrutiny. Not just reporting what they say, but actually looking for policies.

The term ‘fourth estate’ derives from the British Westminster system. This includes the Lords spiritual, the bishops, the Lords temporal, the aristocracy, in the House of Lords and the lower house, House of Commons, representing the majority of people in the Parliament. Accountability was supposed to be ensured by the scrutiny of the parliament by the ‘fourth estate’. Our Parliament is run along Westminster lines- replacing the concept of The House of Lords with the Senate- also supposed to be a house of review.

Under their own code of ethics (which some these days believe an oxymoron) journalists are expected to ‘report and interpret honestly, striving for accuracy, fairness and disclosure of all essential facts. Do not suppress facts or give distorting emphasis.’

(Australian News Commentary. Journalists code of ethics – an oxymoron? http://www.Australian-news.com.au/codethics.htm. Accessed 28/6/2009)

The Journalists’ code states that they are not supposed to display any type of bias. ‘Do not allow personal interest…to undermine your accuracy.’

(Media Entertainment & Arts Alliance, Journalists’ Code of Ethics http://www.alliance.org.au/code of ethics.html. Accessed 24/06/2013)

Additionally, journalists are also expected to apply the rules of disclosure. These say that a journalist must publicise facts about themselves which might reasonably be assumed to colour their opinions.

Opinions might be influenced by belonging to a political party, company or organisation. Equally, being married to someone who was a member of a political party, having worked or consulted for a party, company or organisation. Being a relative, a friend or former employee, would also need to be disclosed, as would any payments made to the journalist or gifts or trips. I believe that these rules are breached almost daily, knowingly, and flagrantly. The process has escalated since the tabloidization of the media.


(Image credit: iStockphoto)

What I want are the facts: unadorned, reported as fairly and accurately as possible, given these I want to evaluate them for myself. Facts unslanted by bias, opinion or commentary.

I don’t want to read reports affected by the ‘special relationship’ a columnist has with a pollie. Neither do I want an opinion paid for by Telstra, Qantas or any major company or person. The type of thing that both John Laws and Alan Jones espoused a few years back, whilst failing to disclose their commercial arrangements to their listeners.

And I want a code that is enforceable: one than makes journalist responsible for accuracy, look out for bias, and actually be responsible for checking their facts. How can I believe in a self-regulating code which has journalists judging the actions of other journalists? A code that has no meaningful penalties?

One example we in Australia might emulate is a code that has amazed Americans: the Canadian Truth in Media Code. This made news when a new broadcaster, SUN TV, wanted to enter the Canadian television news market.

Americans discovered that you could not lie on Canadian broadcast news. They were shocked. The idea that a FOX-type news programme was set to be presented in Canada galvanised thousands of ordinary Canadians into action. They liked their factual news, and did not want to the sort of reporting FOX is known for.


(Image credit: Roguemedia)

The Canadian Media Authority, CRTC or Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (similar to our ACMA) had a proposal under consideration, one which would have relaxed the current rules. Disallowed programming content included ‘broadcasting false or misleading news’. The plan to loosen up this rule was scrapped once Canadians made their feeling known. It appears the public feared a lack of civility in public discourse and a deliberate muddying of political waters.

(On the Media http://www.onthemedia.org/2011/mar/o4/lying-is-illegal-in-canadian-broadcast-news-transcript.30/06/2013)

Canadians expected, nay, demanded that their news remained factual. While the Canadian code only applied to broadcast news, it is surely not beyond the will and wit of lawmakers to extend its scope to newspaper reportage. Something similar, if applied here, might help restore civility to the public domain.

If newspaper sales are declining (and they are) and journalists are held in little regard, may I suggest that in some small part this situation is of their own making? They told us what they were supposed to do – and then failed to do it.

They played their own game, rewrote the rules to suit themselves, and forgot that they were supposed to be representing us, the people: verifying facts, and working on our behalf. Instead they decided to collaborate, to tell us the same stories, and to direct us to think as they did and do as they told us. How can they fail to realise they trashed the brand?

——————————————————————————————————-

Disclaimer. I am not, nor have ever been a member of any political party, none of my family are politicians, I have not worked, consulted or been paid by any political organisation, or worked for any political organisation in a paid or voluntary capacity.

I am simply a citizen with an interest in politics.

963 thoughts on ““Just the facts, ma’am”: What a citizen should expect from the media”

  4. I’m not a big Peter Sculthorpe fan: he seems to insist on BIG.

    Corroboree: +1 for contra-bassoon(?) solo; -eleventy for pretension. (Intro only – YMMV.)

    For a piece written “for” JW (solo guitarist), From Kakadu was pretty underwhelming. (Insert random. non-standard chord here.)

  5. http://inside.org.au/bob-carr-and-the-ghost-of-philip-ruddock/

    …As Philip Ruddock once told me, “there is nothing more galling to a people smuggler than to find his clients back, unsuccessful.” When that happens, he said, the smuggling stops. If the foreign minister is confident in his assessment that many recently arrived asylum seekers are really economic migrants, then he should let the refugee determination system do its work.

  6. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/03/tony-abbott-cost-living-pressures

    In the interview with the journal World Affairs, Abbott said …
    …listing the characteristics that made Australia “undeniably successful”, he nominated its “high and rising standard of living”, as well as “just and generally accepted institutions” and “a relatively happy recent history”.

    Which is also fine, except when you compare it with almost all the Coalition’s messaging for the duration of Abbott’s leadership, which has constantly told us that we are suffering debilitating and escalating “cost of living pressures”, particularly because of the carbon tax.

  7. http://m.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/julia-gillard-to-remain-figure-on-world-stage-says-us-ambassador-jeffrey-bleich/story-fn59niix-1226673759786

    US Ambassador to Australia Jeffrey Bleich has tipped a future on the world stage for Julia Gillard, praising the former prime minister as an “extraordinarily talented and well-respected” person.

    “She made a great impression on myself and on President (Barack) Obama and other leaders in the United States,” Mr Bleich said today.

    “I know she will continue to play an important role in the US-Australia relationship and continue to be a respected figure on the world stage.”…

  8. Jaeger,

    I wrote a brilliant comment but my computer ant the internet started a brawl.

    Point was that his non-commissioned works were grandiose, in my opinion.

    I wouldn’t know musical theory from my cloaca, BTW.

  9. “US Ambassador to Australia Jeffrey Bleich has tipped a future on the world stage for Julia Gillard, praising the former prime minister as an “extraordinarily talented and well-respected” person.”

    Nice to have our opinions blazoned by the US. I think JGPM and BOPOTUS might get things going world-wide. Barack might have problem a bit more important with a certain leaker at the moment.

  12. puffy,

    The big wouldbe “makers” in the ALP are in NSW. Kevvie is trying to separate their nuts from reality.

  13. I wrote a brilliant comment but my computer ant the internet started a brawl.

    Me too – NBN FTW?

    With careful tweaking, I’ve managed to salvage ~4Mbps from crapola… (down from ~6Mbps – 😦 )

  14. ”
    KEVIN Rudd has secured agreement to suspend the NSW Labor Party and place it under the administration of the party’s national executive under dramatic reforms to stamp out corruption and slash union power in the scandal-plagued branch.

    Property developers will also be banned from seeking preselection to become Labor candidates at both the federal and state level.

    The Daily Telegraph understands the new Prime Minister and NSW Party boss Sam Dastyari have secured agreement to have the national executive of the ALP intervene in a bid to sweep out the union-dominated administration in the wake of damning evidence at the NSW ICAC inquiry.

    Asked to comment on the move last night, Mr Rudd told The Daily Telegraph: “The bottom line is I’ve had a gutful of this stuff .. . Labor Party members have had a gutful of this and so has the nation. It must now be fundamentally changed.”

    The move could unleash a backlash from union-aligned powerbrokers who would resent Rudd intervening in state Labor’s affairs.

    It is believed Mr Dastyari, who has led the push for a clean-out of the corruption for three years despite fierce internal resistance, will be given absolute power by Mr Rudd and the party’s ruling national body to implement reforms, including a zero tolerance policy which would see MPs immediately expelled from the party for merely being investigated for corruption.

    The national executive is expected to sack the party’s administrative committee – made up of 80 per cent union officials – and ensure at least 50 per cent of new committee members are rank and file members.

    Independent directors will also be appointed to run the Labor Party.
    …
    “

  15. That toccata and fugue has morphed into something J S could not have imagined.

  16. You have a “minor” fracture of your pelvis and you want to ride on?!

  18. bejing olympics, I think it was. Aussie Equestrian team rider broke her leg in the cross country. next day, needed to complete the showjumping round for team medal. strapped the leg and rode the horse over the jumps. one tough cookie.

  19. puffy,

    In one of the Olympics (1960?) a Hoy did a rib or two and did the cross country to win gold.

  23. The advantage of going on a break is that the teams not in the break want a race win and that the teams of those in the front will try to get to the front and try to slow down the peloton (not easy to do).

  24. puff,

    Busy typing but the panels and the wind turbines are propagating like coat hangers in a dark cupboard.

  26. Djokovic through to the semis to meet Del Potro. Now, if we could only get rid of Murray!

  31. Three minutes. The Pom commentators are focusing on Manx Cavendish.

  33. A four-man break with a little climb, 24 ks @ 2’50 will not last.

Comments are closed.