Give Us Shelter: Why New Domestic Violence Funding Isn’t Anywhere Enough

In this post, published at No Place for Sheep earlier today, Dr Jennifer Wilson makes a scathing attack on pm turnbull’s “new” money to combat the scourge of domestic violence. Thank you, Jennifer.

The Turnbull government’s announcement last week of $100 million worth of funding to address domestic violence is better than than silence, and goes to some small way towards acknowledging the enormous problem this country has with male violence against women.

But what it does not do, and for this appalling omission the government should be unrelentingly and loudly pilloried, is fund the urgent immediate need for frontline services such as refuges and community legal centres, both of which are a woman’s first stop when she’s forced to flee a dangerous domestic situation.

What this says to me is that safe, secure, un-threatened people such as politicians have absolutely no idea what it is like to be in a situation of such extreme danger that you have to flee, or risk injury or death to yourself and your children by staying.

And flee to where, exactly?

Not only do these fortunate politicians have no idea what this situation feels like, they apparently don’t care. Neither do have they the imagination to picture such a scene, and how they might feel in it.

Legal services are outraged at Minister for Women Michaelia Cash’s apparent spin on funding cuts that will directly affect women suffering domestic violence, and will see the centres in dire financial straits by 2017.

If politicians had the capacity to imagine themselves in such a situation, they would perhaps begin to understand that providing refuges for women and children must be the first priority in any plan to end family violence, in conjunction with some of the other options funding currently covers.

As I write this and as you read it, there will be women, alone or with their children, trying to get out of a house which is not a safe environment for them because it’s inhabited by a violent male intent on doing them harm. They need somewhere to go. Right now.

This ought not to be a difficult situation for a government to remedy. Providing funding for women’s refuges and legal centres is not going to break the budget. Yet, after decades of feminist activism we are going backwards: closing refuges, threatening the funding of community legal centres, handing over the refuges that remain to religious organisations who have little or no experience with the repercussions of domestic violence, and whose workers are primarily trained to deal with homelessness, not specifically with traumatised women and children fleeing abuse.

Solutions to domestic violence can’t be a one size fits all. Some women will be able to stay in their homes. Others will absolutely not. The period when a woman attempts to leave an abusive situation is well-recognised as the most dangerous for her, and for children involved. It is when she is most likely to be murdered, or severely injured, as the perpetrator’s rage escalates at the prospect of abandonment, and loss of control over his partner. Nothing will help in such situations if first-off, the woman has nowhere to go.

This is not complicated. Why will politicians not act to save women’s lives in the most pressing, the most obvious way, by adequately funding and staffing refuges and legal centres for the increasing numbers of women and children who have to get out, and have no place to which they can flee?

Advertisements

448 thoughts on “Give Us Shelter: Why New Domestic Violence Funding Isn’t Anywhere Enough

  1. Something you didn’t know about Mal Brough

    When he went into parliament his nickname among the pollies was ‘Captain Decore’, referring to his army career and his other job – hair product salesman. It would have been around the time this ad was clogging up our TV screens.

    Brough refers to this work as ‘running a small business’ and has never admitted to having the nickname.
    http://malbrough.com.au/about/

  2. puffy

    I quite agree with you. It was one of the things that raised my eye brows when the trend was on during Howie’s days. Some of the salary packages that being done were amazing. So of course the usual corporate bizoid types rushed in and many of those who had run the operations on the smell of an oily rag trampled under foot.

    I noted that several people involved in HoJo and Arfur’s problems were also involved in non profit + charitable organisations at management/board level. Oh and yes they were all “chaps” .

  3. Grandiosity, paranoia, the Republicans, and donald trump:

    When individual psychopathology becomes a collective filter for understanding the political world, we see—as we do in the rhetoric and vision of today’s GOP—a pathological set of values guaranteed to lead to pathological policies. If I were to try to list the essential psychological dynamics underlying grandiosity and paranoia in the patients I see, and you were to simply replace the personal pronoun “I” with “America” or “the American people” and “you” and “them” with one of the scapegoats demonized by the GOP (e.g., people with darker skins, the wrong religion or different sexual orientation), the symmetry between crazy individuals and crazy politics becomes clearer.

    http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/psychologist-puts-trump-and-gop-couch?akid=13536.1084000.UjId7Q&rd=1&src=newsletter1043311&t=2

  4. The White House warned Russia that its military actions in Syria risk prolonging the four-year-old conflict in the country as the US and Russian military leaders spoke about “de-conflicting” the situation.
    On the second day of air strikes by Russian planes in Syria, US president Barack Obama’s spokesman Josh Earnest described the actions of the Russians as “indiscriminate”, saying that they risked drawing Moscow further into the conflict.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/middle-east/us-warns-russia-over-dangers-of-military-action-in-syria-1.2375216

    I wonder if Russia is willing to take in some of the thousands of refugees who flee Syria and other countries affected by its strikes.

  5. Some good news, and possibly a small slap in the face for Turnbull.

    A soccer journalist sacked by SBS for criticising jingoistic Anzac Day celebrations will get his “day in court” after a tribunal rejected the broadcaster’s bid to block his unfair dismissal case.
    The judicial officer presiding over the hearing also reminded those who wanted to stymie Scott McIntyre’s case that many Australians had died to protect “rights and freedoms” such as access to a fair legal hearing

    http://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/public-service/scott-mcintyre-free-to-challenge-anzac-day-twitter-sacking-after-tribunal-criticises-sbs-20151001-gjzhyu.html#ixzz3nLngwAdg

    Without Turnbull’s confected, publicity-seeking outrage and interfering this might all have been avoided.
    http://www.crikey.com.au/2015/04/27/turnbull-dobbed-in-sacked-sbs-reporter-over-anzac-tweets/

  6. gigilene

    “The White House warned Russia that its military actions in Syria risk prolonging the four-year-old conflict in the country”
    .
    Given their track record in the ME the White House is about the last place to go to for advice. I think the US is more worried the Russkiys will succeed where they failed.

Comments are closed.